Support and Defend
Any red-blooded American Patriot paying attention, can’t help noticing the breathtaking pace with which our once great nation is self-destructing. More accurately, it is being systematically dismantled by determined domestic enemies of Liberty. Anyone unfamiliar with the “Cloward and Piven” strategy to implement a Marxist revolution in America, by first deliberately collapsing our economy, should look it up. Committed Marxists, calling themselves “Progressives,” have been diligently about the task of dumbing us down, promoting collectivism, and subverting our Constitution for over one hundred years.
The blue-blooded Progressives’ agenda went into overdrive with the remarkable election of the virtually unknown (and largely unknowable) glib pandering demagogue, who calls himself Barak Obama. While they represent less than one quarter of our population, and the hardcore subversives are only a fraction of that, for a variety of reasons, circumstances conspired to give them full control of both the Executive and Legislative branches of our Federal government for the first time in a generation. With the international banking crisis for cover, these Saul Alinsky inspired radicals have been debauching our currency and flagrantly ignoring the restraints of the Constitution and wishes of the general public to, in Obama’s own words, “fundamentally transform America” into the utopian dream he inherited from his committed Marxist father.
Newly awakened and alarmed TEA Party folk retook control of the House of Representatives in 2010, and are keeping pressure on the Progressive (Lite) Republican establishment, so Obama no longer has a compliant legislature. Now, he is simply ignoring acts (or inactions) of Congress and governs by dictatorial executive fiat. Almost daily now, we hear of ever more onerous departmental regulations and/or executive orders implementing policies the Progressives are unable to get passed by the legislature. I think we are at an existential tipping point. It may already be too late to stop them; but we have to try. We certainly need a more expeditious plan to rein in our out-of-control Federal government, than hoping for change after the 2012 elections.
“I, Dave Hunter, do solemnly swear that I will support and defend the Constitution of the United States against all enemies, foreign and domestic…”
I first swore that oath as a seventeen-year-old Army recruit during the Vietnam war. The several times I renewed it as a peace officer were redundant. In my mind, the first one never expired, and never will. I may just be a retired old man, armed now only with a keyboard; but my passion for individual Liberty and reverence for our cherished Constitution, burns as bright as ever. I have lived the American dream of my own patriotic, industrious, and fiercely independent father; and I want my heirs to have the same opportunity to live their lives as they choose to live them.
If Obama prefers the collectivist nanny-state of his own father’s dreams, I suggest he pick another country. We must not allow him to overthrow this one. I beseech all Patriots to assist me with a simple action plan for vanquishing the treasonous domestic enemies overrunning our White House. At the same time, we will be putting all politicians on notice that we the people demand they respect our Constitution in its minutest detail, and require them to honor the oath they take to support and defend it.
Uncommon History:
The essential difference between a constitutional republic and a democracy is that a republic enshrines protection for the rights of individuals and minorities in its constitution, protecting them from the whim of the majority; while a democracy is essentially mob rule, where the collective can utilize the coercive power of government to impose their will on individuals and minorities. Republics employ “representatives” to defend citizens’ interests from the natural inclination of government functionaries to overreach limited authority; the rights of the individual are paramount. Democracies select “leaders” with grandiose “visions” to utilize the coercive power of government to impose their model of an ideal society on others, the welfare of the collective is paramount.
Those of us old enough to have studied American History back before the Progressives invented “Social Studies,” understand that our Founders formed a constitutional republic, not a democracy. The notion that it would ever be empowered to violate the property rights of a minority, at the whim of the majority, and confiscate the earnings of industrious citizens for redistribution among the indolent, would have been anathema to them. These proud representatives of our self-sufficient pioneering stock considered charity, and such “social engineering” by nosey busybodies as they might have tolerated, to be within the purview of the church, not a coercive Federal government.
Our Constitution was not designed as a plaything for pandering demagogues to act out their altruistic Robin Hood fantasies. Government functionaries at all levels were meant to be servants of the people, with their activities closely monitored and regulated by the people – not the other way around. It only established a federation of thirteen individual sovereign states, as a combination free trade agreement (think European Union) and mutual defense pact (think NATO). Unrestrained commerce, sound money, and international relations were what was foremost on our Founders’ minds as they debated how best to govern themselves as a nation – not regulating the activities of individual citizens, whom they regarded as the true sovereigns in their classical liberal view of Natural Law. By design, the power of the Federal government to interfere in the affairs of its constituent states was extremely limited. Its ability to interfere in the routine daily lives of their citizens was virtually nonexistent.
As inspired as the Constitutional Convention’s work product was, Patriots freshly shed of the tyranny of a monarch routinely violating their Natural Rights as freemen, were mistrustful of surrendering any of their hard-won sovereignty to another distant and powerful central government (just as Patriots today balk at the Progressive NWO agenda for surrendering our sovereignty to a global government). Thus, several of the states refused to ratify the Constitution until the Bill of Rights was included. This was to make damn sure the Federal government they were agreeing to join understood that its powers were strictly limited to only those specifically enumerated, and the Natural Rights of its citizens would remain forever inalienable.
The resultant federation of individually sovereign states worked splendidly for nearly 100 years, as unfettered and productive sovereign citizens were empowered to flourish in a relatively safe free-trade zone with sound money. Admittedly, the basic nature of our government began unraveling with the Civil War, and was effectively eviscerated by the Progressive atrocities committed in 1913, our darkest year (Amendments 16 & 17, and the Federal Reserve Act). Still, thoughtful students of our true history cannot be faulted for pining for a return of the halcyon days of our nation’s youth, when individual opportunity trumped collective victimhood for industrious citizens. Only the numbed minds of the easily deluded could consider the pernicious slide back into serfdom offered by the collectivists, as anything even approaching “progress.”
I reckon our Constitution, if it has any meaning at all as the supreme law of the land, must mean precisely what our Founders intended it to mean at the time they penned it, except as duly amended. Since the process for amending it is clearly prescribed, I utterly reject the notion of a “Living Constitution” that can be capriciously modified by creative “interpretations” of partisan judicial activists, to give the government powers to meddle in our daily lives they clearly were never meant to have.
They are our employees, dammit, not our rulers. As a sovereign citizen, I owe no respect or allegiance to judicial fiat, and no duty to obey any statutes, rules, or regulations common sense alone would deem unconstitutional with regard to original intent. Born a freeman in the land of the free and the home of the brave, color me an unchained and incurably contumacious Patriot, who has had quite enough of such tomfoolery. If we somehow survive the looming Constitutional crisis, resolving this issue should be paramount in the aftermath.
Present Peril:
America, unbelievably, finds itself dazed and on the ropes. Yet, the propaganda industry (aka news media) and political parties are already gleefully gearing up to marginalize or destroy popular candidates and promote their preferred choices for 2012. One would think that the only import of the multitude of looming existential crises angling for our knockout blow, is the potential effect they might have on an election that is still a year and a half away. Once again, the sheeple are being suckered with a message of hope for change, by the Incumbrepublocrats who will say and do anything to keep their cushy jobs.
Supposedly, we can cure what ails us by promoting more self-serving professional politicians with the proper “experience,” “leadership,” and “vision” from the minors (thus opening apprenticeship positions in State governments for a new crop of ambitious young lawyers from all the best Progressive schools); as if a hundred years of steady erosion of our Constitution, with entrenched bureaucracies regulating our every move, could ever be reversed by just electing a few more moderately Progressive R’s than dogmatically Progressive D’s. Wake-up Patriots; the “lessor of two evils” is a rigged game, where hope for change is an illusion, and the evil of Progressivism cannot lose.
If polls continue to indicate he might lose it, what gives anyone confidence Chairman Obama will even permit another election? He continuously demonstrates his contempt for our Constitution, and is already issuing dictatorial edicts to overrule the will of Congress. It would be child’s play for his Alinsky-schooled revolutionary cohorts and Marxist led union thugs, to instigate some sort of false-flag civil upheaval, to justify martial law and the postponement of the election. If you think this impossible in America, you haven’t been paying close enough attention lately. Who would stop them? How? Remember the public’s reaction to the OKC bombing (a classic false-flag operation that shut down a burgeoning Patriot/Militia movement overnight)? With their control of the media, propaganda could have the sheeple demanding that all those dastardly TEA Party “subversives” be rounded up. The feckless Republican establishment would run for cover and disavow us in a heartbeat.
I submit that even without such shenanigans, and conservative capitalists were able to pull off a game-changing electoral sweep in 2012, we do not have that much time. The Progressives are deliberately spending us into oblivion, with borrowed money our grandkids will never be able to repay. If we do not shut down the destructive revolutionary agenda of the present administration immediately, and put Americans back to work rebuilding our failing economy, it could be too far gone to save by Inauguration Day 2013. If we do not stop abusing the Treasury printing presses at the current rate, our currency could be well on its way to becoming as worthless as Zimbabwe’s by then, and foreigners won’t be interested in loaning us any more real money without real collateral.
If we do not reverse our foolish course of meddling with the balance of power in the Middle East, we may even spark a nuclear conflagration there before 2013, which would likely ignite another world war with devastating consequences. Whatever one thinks of the Israel vs Palestine issue, if one doesn’t think Israel will use their nukes to defend their very existence, one doesn’t understand the Jews. If we were about to be overrun, slaughtered, and driven into the sea by suicidal barbarians who teach their children that we are subhuman, would we use ours? Like it or not, we need to vociferously vow to immediately defend Israel against any aggressor (and somehow convince the world that we actually mean it), just to try to deter the Islamic countries from foolishly invading them again.
This risk only fortifies my assessment that we must begin immediately, on a massive scale, to develop our own domestic energy supplies, or our economy might never recover from a loss of access to Arabian oil. I am weary of the environmentalists’ argument that it takes to long to bring new wells into production, so drilling is never considered a viable solution to the recurring energy crisis. Had we started back when they first began saying this, we could easily be self-sufficient by now.
We need to rein in this runaway Marxist-spawned environmental movement and reassert the supremacy of human welfare over 2″ fish, 3″ lizards, and frozen tundra, which 99% of mankind will never personally see. Even pristine vistas are of little value to those who cannot afford the fuel to visit them. Just turning loose our own domestic energy industries to tap our own massive resources, would instigate an unbelievable jobs boom that could turn our economy around overnight. Drill, baby, drill – drill NOW!
Then, there is the issue of the security of our southern border. Since our native population thoughtlessly bought into the Malthusian ZPG nonsense of the ’70s and has stopped breeding enough to even maintain our population, much less grow it, I recognize our need for new immigrants. How else could we keep the SSI and Medicare Ponzi schemes afloat? But they should come through the front door as invited guests, learn to speak our language, and assimilate into our culture. The opportunity we offer an immigrant is golden, and we should demand no less of those desiring to share the prosperous paradise our forefathers expended their sweat and blood to create and defend for us.
It is not xenophobic to lament the outsourcing of our reproductive chores to Mexico, and be unwilling to tolerate those who illegally sneak into our country uninvited, refuse to adopt our way of life, and refuse to learn and speak our language. It is not racist to be offended by those angrily waving foreign flags in our streets, while demanding supposed rights to our infrastructure and welfare largess, and illegally voting in our elections for pandering Progressives, who promise them amnesty and citizenship.
All over the world well-educated and highly skilled people, who already speak good english, would gladly pay dearly for a chance to legally immigrate here. Rather than become a burden on us, they would bring cash to invest and thrive in our free-market economy. Why in the world do we reject these middle-class entrepreneurs, in favor of the underworld of uneducated and undocumented peasants now spreading welfare-funded, third-world like, ethnic ghettos all across our country? Could it simply be that they are easier to exploit?
The Indictment:
Maybe the rules have changed, but I doubt that one in ten of all the radical “czars,” special advisors, et al, whom Obama has managed to install in the top echelons of government without Senate confirmation, could have passed the rigorous FBI background check for a Top-Secret security clearance that I had to go through back in the ’60′s. Least of all, Obama himself (just read his own memoirs). Think about that. Those old enough to remember “Duck & Cover” drills in school, and/or investing time in their prime youth overseas trying to save the Free World from the advance of Communism, should be chilled by this inescapable truth. My mind boggles (and shudders) at the thought that a man, whose shadowy radical Marxist background should disqualify him for even a Confidential level security clearance, is now acting as CinC.
With no time left to spare, I think we must immediately consider the nuclear option to rid ourselves of this Marxist pretender and all of his revolutionary associates from our White House. There is a way to do this expeditiously that is infinitely simpler than an election, with the added advantage of immediately reversing much of the damage he has already done. It is recognized by far more politicos and judges than will admit so publicly, that Obama is a patent fraud who, by definition, is ineligible for the office of POTUS. All we have to do is stand up on our hind legs, ignore the taunts of “racist” or “birther” by mindless Obots, and demand in every forum available to us that he either resign immediately, or be arrested for fraud (if not treason) and bodily removed from the office he has usurped.
Much has been made of his obviously phony birth certificate(s) (the “long form” version he recently released is such a provably and amateurishly forged document it is laughable), and needless speculation regarding the place of his birth. Jerome Corsi’s new book, “Where’s the Birth Certificate, The Case That Barak Obama is Not Eligible to be President” is very compelling on many important issues beyond such speculation. He does a masterful job of documenting how fraudulent his nativity and early life narrative really is. The man is a complete phony, regardless of where he happened to be born, which I have always viewed as misdirection to obscure more salient details of his past.
Almost more compelling and egregious, is Jack Cashill’s new book, “Deconstructing Obama, The Life, Loves, and Letters of Americas’s First Postmodern President.” It makes an essentially irrefutable case that Obama’s famed literary masterpiece, “Dreams from my Father” (on which his reputation as a brilliant intellectual is solely based), was actually written almost entirely by, of all people, his terrorist pal Bill Ayers. This was a premeditated and calculated effort to manufacture a phony narrative for Obama’s life, and he continues to tell the baldfaced lie that he wrote it by himself, to mock ghost-written books of political opponents.
Both books convince any open-minded rational reader that Obama’s nativity story is mostly fiction. (E.g. Obama’s parents never lived together as man and wife. They provably weren’t even living in the same State after his birth, much less the same house.) For those confused about what actually makes Obama tick, another recent book that elegantly explains his disdain for Western Civilization, is Dinesh D’Souza’s, “The Roots of Obama’s Rage.” While these three carefully researched and heavily documented books are fascinating reading, resoundingly impeaching his veracity, motives, and loyalty to our American culture, these are really only side issues swirling about this carefully scripted phony, which need not be proven one way or the other to oust him.
The Remedy:
All the Sturm und Drang over the inability to legitimately document Obama’s past was, and is, completely unnecessary to the cause of removing him from office. He has himself repeatedly claimed that his father was a Kenyan, visiting here on a temporary student visa, and has acknowledged that this means he was born a British Subject. In fact, he claims to have been born in Hawaii as a “dual-citizen.” By definition, regardless of the place of birth, one cannot be born at the same time a British Subject and a Natural Born Citizen of the U.S.A. That fact alone is all that is needed to summarily evict him from our White House as an ineligible usurper, guilty of the greatest fraud ever perpetrated upon America. This is what we need to focus on, to the exclusion of all other distracting details of his fraudulent past. I suspect that if all the effort that has gone into trying to prove he was born in Kenya, had instead been put into educating the American public on the original definition of “Natural Born” citizen, he would have never been elected in the first place, or allowed to be sworn in if he had.
There are three ways one may acquire U.S. citizenship, one of which is the “naturalization” process, whereby a foreigner renounces previous allegiances to become an American. For “birthright” natives, we recognize both “jus soli” (right of soil) or “jus sanguinis” (right of blood) citizenship; but the only way to be considered a “Natural Born” citizen is to qualify as both. Please read the following paragraph carefully… at least twice:
We regard those born on our soil as “birthright” natives (jus soli), regardless of parentage; but they may also be regarded as citizens (jus sanguinis) of a foreign parent’s country. We also regard children born to American citizen parents as “birthright” natives (jus sanguinis), regardless of the place of their birth; but if born overseas, they may also be considered citizens (jus soli) by the country wherein they were born. (e.g. “anchor babies” are born citizens of both the U.S. and Mexico). By definition, “Natural Born” citizens are free of such potential divided loyalties, which means they must have been born on our sovereign territory (jus soli), to parents who were both already legal U.S. citizens (jus sanguinis). This legal term specifically means precisely that; it is not a synonym for “native born,” or “birthright,” or just the opposite of “naturalized.” It defines a citizen with no legal ties whatever to any foreign country, who thus could never be conflicted by divided loyalty.
The recurring issue of divided loyalties during wartime, from the common intermarriage of European royalty, caused John Jay to suggest that we could avoid such international intrigue by Constitutionally requiring our CinC to be a “Natural Born Citizen,” an unambiguous legal term our Founders plucked from Vattel’s, “The Law of Nations.” Thus, it was purposefully inserted as an eligibility requirement in Article 2, Section 1, Clause 5 of our Constitution, without objection or debate. No amount of lawyerly obfuscation, derision, or name calling by Obama supporters can change the plain meaning of this legal term at the time our Founders employed it.
That’s all we require. If we really want to rid ourselves of this usurper, all we need do is get enough citizens to understand the proper definition of “Natural Born” and speak up – or at least support those of us unafraid to do so. With the backing of enough American people, a single celebrity could blow him out of the saddle, almost overnight. Imagine if a Donald Trump, Sarah Palin, et al were to call a news conference, succinctly make the case, and demand he resign immediately, or face arrest for fraud and treason. It might take a few days, but like Rep. Weiner, the chorus would only grow. We could be magnanimous and give him a couple of days to flee the country back to one of the lands of his two foreign fathers (or any other Marxist paradise of his choosing), rather than arrest him for his crimes, if he cooperates expeditiously without a fuss.
Please understand that this could be accomplished very quickly. There would be no impeachment required, as only a legal President need (or even could) be impeached. Once it is clearly understood and sufficiently acknowledged that he was never eligible, were he to resist, the only due process available to him would be arrest, a perp walk to jail, and a trial as a common criminal in a court of law. Those politicos who already understand this (and they are legion) would fold quickly and jump aboard, because their own oath to defend the Constitution would require no less, and they know it.
The same is true for all sworn peace officers (including his Secret Service detail), officers of the courts, and military personnel, all of whom have taken that same oath, which supersedes any obligation to follow his orders or protect him. Once this supposed Constitutional law professor is publicly condemned as knowingly having defrauded us, beyond the Black Caucus and a few openly fellow Marxists, he would have almost no defenders in Washington. Even the arguably complicit media elites would soon turn on him like a wounded beast.
The Aftermath:
Frankly, there are a few reasons this hasn’t already happened, perhaps even before he was erroneously sworn into office. Beyond the crippling component of “White Guilt,” brilliantly articulated by Shelby Steele, there is a palpable and not unreasonable fear among politicos of a violent backlash from the ghettos and college campuses. This concern rose abruptly once Obama overtook Hilary in the primary, and attained rock star status as the “Chosen One.” This explains why her PUMA opposition researchers (who started the “Birther” movement), failed to get any traction for their revelations regarding his secretive past and inconsistencies in his phony narrative.
Once elected, the issue was elevated to a potential Constitutional crisis, which the Judiciary and Legislature alike are loath to trigger. Then, not insignificantly, Joe Biden would become President, which would be unattractive to R’s and D’s alike. Now, the R’s, liking their chances in 2012, don’t want to give the D’s the opportunity to introduce fresh blood into the primary season, and Hilary would probably run again too. While still a dereliction of their duty to defend the Constitution, tactically this might even make sense, if the untold damage being done to our country in the meantime, was not so devastating.
Next, two of the rising stars in the Republican Party, who are often mentioned as future Presidential hopefuls, are themselves ineligible for the office for the very same reason. Neither Bobby Jindal nor Marco Rubio’s parents were U.S. citizens when these two were born here. Yes, they were both born legal citizens on our soil, but they are not “Natural Born” citizens, by definition. Too bad for these admirable gentlemen; but either the Constitution is the supreme law of the land or it is meaningless. Amend it if that is thought necessary; but we bend or ignore it for transient causes at our nation’s peril.
Since any act of a usurper, illegally acting under the color of law, is null and void, the aftermath of this action will necessarily be messy. It will be the equivalent of repealing every legislative act he has signed, and reversing every appointment he ever made. Congress will need to resurrect those bills it can still pass (and undoubtedly argue again over those they now can’t), so Biden can sign them if he chooses. He will need to appoint his own cabinet and will have a huge backlog of judicial appointments to make (including two SCOTUS justices), and depending how many are new faces, the Senate will be very busy advising and consenting.
More importantly, the fear of the reaction of the ghettos and campuses, to any attempt to oust their beloved Messiah, is all too real. Unfortunately, Obama’s defenders have done such a masterful job of couching all dissent from his revolutionary agenda in terms of racial bigotry and/or supposed redneck ignorance, that many are afraid the cities would burn. This is not an insignificant concern; but at this point the very survival of our way of life and our grandchildren’s future is at stake.
I say, let them burn. If we are destined for another civil war to get our country back, let’s get it over with while there is still something left to save. If the rioters stay in the cities, I’ll watch them destroy their own neighborhoods on TV again. Their grocery stores will be empty in three days and they will have to settle down eventually, if they want our truck drivers to deliver them some more food. Else, if they are foolish enough to try to bring their riots out here in flyover country, I’m betting on us well-armed rednecks.
Enough is enough… to hell with Obama’s Marxist father’s anti-colonial dreams; it is time to take our country back and rebuild it in the image of our own Forefathers’ dreams. As Americans, we deserve the dignity of an honest job to support our families, without being dependent on a socialist welfare state for a make-work job or demeaning handouts. All we need do is loudly, publicly, and resolutely demand that our public servants honor their oath to defend our Constitution and evict the arrogant bastard. It is really that simple. Who among us has the guts to stand up in honor of our Forefathers’ sacrifices and do the same for our own posterity?
Let’s get to work. The biggest hurdle is to educate average Americans that “Natural Born” is not just the opposite of “Naturalized,” or just means born in America. Learn, understand, internalize, and own the above explanation of the issue. Then, teach it to everyone you know. Cut & paste it into every forum you participate in and start discussions. Maybe apply the slogan, “Born a Brit – Not Legit” to the concept (I forget where I once saw that; but it is catchy). Keep it alive.
And, please pass this on any way you can think of; e-mail lists, Facebook, twitter, etc. I intend to publish it on every Patriot/TEA Party social networking site I can find. Please do the same. I will keep a copy of it in the essays section of my blog at:
http://www.thoughtsaloud.com/essays/support-and-defend/
Or, shortened at:
Update: A PDF of this, suitable for e-mailing and/or printing, has been graciously made available at:
http://www.modernfeudalserf.org/articles/support_and_defend.pdf
You are free to copy any or all of it and publish it anywhere you like, with or without attribution. This is not about who gets credit… it is about trying to save our country, while there might still be time left to do so, with the least complicated, most expeditious, means available. Please, I beg of you sons and daughters of Liberty, and all who have ever taken the oath to support and defend our Constitution – stand up and do your duty. It just may truly be now or never. ◄Dave►
81 Responses to “Support and Defend”
Leave a Reply
[...] Support and Defend [...]
Excellent, excellent piece! I will be sharing. Thank you for taking action and thank you for your service to our great Republic!
http://www.ShareTheConstitution.com
Learn & share the US founding documents & principles with your friends [& politicians] via social media!
Thank you, Sir. I look forward to perusing your site with a Windows machine. It doesn’t work from my iPad. ◄Dave►
PLEASE keep up the push to oust this usurper from our country!
Thank you! I will be passing it on. I also was just made aware of a Birther Summit being organized for March 28-30 in D.C. The Army surgeon who was jailed for failing to deploy based on an ileligible CIC is helping organize it. The website is http://www.birthersummit.com. We need to take action; our Constitution demands it.
I am not sure we can afford to wait until next spring, Mary. This country is going downhill way too fast.
The usurper Obama should be removed from office, by force if necessary, but as a usurper Congress cannot impeach him.
Constitutional law expert Edwin Vieira wrote an excellent article prior to the 2008 election stating that Obama is the probably the gravest constitutional crisis in the nation’s history. He stated since Obama’s citizenship has been seriously questioned, the burden of proof rests squarely on his shoulders. Bute v. Illinois, 333 U.S. 640, 653 (1948). If Obama is not “a natural born Citizen” or has renounced such citizenship, he is not eligible for “the Office of President” (Article II, Section 1, Clause 4) and therefore he cannot be “elected” by the voters, by the Electoral College, or by the House of Representatives (see Amendment XII). He will be nothing but an usurper. If Obama dares to take the Presidential “Oath or Affirmation” of office, knowing that he is not “a natural born Citizen,” he will commit the crime of perjury or false swearing (see Article II, Section 1, Clause 7). Thus he cannot “faithfully execute the Office of President of the United States,” or even execute it at all. Obama’s every subsequent act in the usurped “Office of President” will be a criminal offense under Title 18, United States Code, Section 242. Congress can pass no law while an usurper pretends to occupy “the Office of President.” If Obama does become an usurper posturing as “the President,” Congress cannot even impeach him because, not being the actual President, he cannot be “removed from Office on Impeachment for, and Conviction of, Treason, Bribery, or other high Crimes and Misdemeanors” (see Article II, Section 4). In that case, some other public officials would have to arrest him-—with physical force, if he would not go along quietly—-in order to prevent him from continuing his imposture. Just about everything that was done during his faux “tenure in office” by anyone connected with the Executive Branch of the General Government, and quite a bit done by the Legislative Branch and perhaps the Judicial Branch as well, would be arguably illegitimate and subject to being overturned when a constitutional President was finally installed in office.
http://www.newswithviews.com/Vieira/edwin84.htm
Edwin Vieira, Jr., holds four degrees from Harvard: A.B. (Harvard College), A.M. and Ph.D. (Harvard Graduate School of Arts and Sciences), and J.D. (Harvard Law School). For more than thirty years he has practiced law, with emphasis on constitutional issues.
Agreed. Impeachment is not an option. It will take someone making him a deal he can’t refuse to step down rather than be arrested.
That’s not going to happen and if you continue to harp on the eligibility issue, you will help him get re-elected. Is that your goal?
A very interesting read, Dave, to say the least. Brenda, your knowledge of The Holy Scriptures is remarkable. I truly believe that it was GOD’s will that allowed the Founders to come together at that particular time in history produce the greatest nation on earth. I am a never-ending student of early American history and why the Founders relied so much on Divine Providence in the making of our grand republic.
Although Obama claims to be a Christian, all Christians know, or should know, that to be a true Christian one cannot condone abortion, theft [of taxpayer money] or idolatry, or many of the other perversions the secular-progressives have been spoon-feeding us since Woodrow Wilson. “Spreading the wealth” is just three words that mean only stealing more money from those who earned it and handing it out to others who didn’t. For GOD said, “Thou shalt not steal.” Abortion is murder, and GOD said, “Thou shalt not kill.” (Just because the Supreme Court legalized abortion does not make it morally right. It is still murder. They rewrote GOD’s law, meaning they idolized their own opinions while rejecting GOD’s rules. In other words, the seven justices who voted to legalize abortion abandoned their oath of office. They too should be removed from their duties as jurists.) HE also said that HE is the LORD and shall not tolerate those who idolize false gods before HIM. We are all guilty of idolizing at least one form of false god during our lifetime. Such as money, power, people, or even oneself.
I believe that Obama can be removed from office legally by the undisputed evidence that not only is he a non-citizen, but that he has usurped his authority by lying under oath when he took office to defend the Constitution, “so help me God.” Is that not a form of idolatry as well? I think it is.
Oh, one more thing, Steve. One of our greatest presidents of the twentieth century, Ronald Reagan, was no racist. He loved America and its people, much more than you obviously do. If anyone’s a racist, you need look no farther than the current resident of 1600 Pennsylvania Ave. “The Cambridge police acted stupidly.” Remember that quote from our so-called leader? Instead of complaining, why don’t you come up with a viable solution to our nation’s problems, instead of idolizing the false god known as Barak Hussein Obama, or whatever his real name is.
As great as all this sounds, who pray tell, has the strength or numbers or even podium to cause this to begin. We the people are tired and waiting on a leader to emerge and give the call. Life at the whims of a tyrannical government is little good as a life and void of any hope.
Well said.
I’m trying to get it read by Sarah Palin. She is the only one on my radar besides Trump (who I no longer trust) with the requsite gonads to pull something like this off. It is amazing to me that there is not even one journalist interested in the fame and fortune such a move could bring. Whoever does it is guarenteed a bestseller in the aftermath.
Sarah Palin would guarantee an Obama re-election.
Well it looks like Trump is coming out again about how bad Obummer is and that his BC should be “carefully examined”, so just maybe he could be persuaded to do the deed. At least the media part. I’ve been screaming this for 3 years but nobody seems to be willing to do anything. NOW’S the time to do it! His ratings are down, the Dems & Repubs are fighting with him about this debt crisis, etc. Issa is investigating the “fast & furious”. It’s the BEST time it could be done. Let’s DO IT!!!
Agreed. Me too on the three years. The place or documentation of his birth have never been an issue for me. By definition he is not a NBC… Born a Brit – Not Legit…
It was a very well written article with many valid points. However, I’d like to add one last
thought,November 22,1963 was Totally unnecessary! While JFK’s personal life may not have been Spic and Span, Over all,I believe he tried to do what was best for America. However, our commander and cheese that we’ve got now is a totally different kettle of fish! This last sentence will air my feelings pretty well. Where are the modern day Lee Harvey Oswalds when we need them dreadfully?!?!?!?!
Thanks for the kind words (to me) Walter, and I understand your frustration; but we need to oust this guy in total disgrace – not make a martyr out of him…
So you are advocating that the president of the united states be assassinated?
I won’t go so far as to advocate that a President of the United States be assassinated but I will go so far as to advocate that the anti-American, anti-Capitalism, anti-Christian and anti-Caucasion usurper currently occupying the Office of the Presidency be immediately arrested, tried, convicted and executed for Treason against the U.S. Constitution.
Well said, Jim. As long as he is thoroughly disgraced and tried first, hang him high.
Excellent article. I will pass on. If you are looking for the smoking gun, this is the best one to sell ideas to Americans.
Every citizen of the USA should read the article at the link below. And every citizen will begin to understand what our government represents and how they have totally screwed the middle and lower class. I urge you to read the article and pass it on to everyone you know. This is unbelievable.
http://ampedstatus.org/how-your-social-security-money-was-stolen-where-did-the-2-5-trillion-surplus-go/
I have read your linked article in its entirity and find it rather disingenious. There is nothing at all new there that anyone paying attention hasn’t known all along. What do you think the old “lock box” debate was all about? I note the author’s bias against Republican Presidents and top income taxpayers. Reagan was trying to save SSI, not loot it. The same for Bush in ’04. That subsequent politicians spent the money on vote buying social programs and/or military adventures, justified or not, doesn’t equate to “giving it to the wealthy” by lowering their already high taxes.
Taxes are all paid by consumers anyway, not be the wealthy. Read my “Who Really Pays Most Taxes?” essay in the right column. No matter where they pretend to get increased revenue to pay for the SSI shortfall, the average middle class working stiff will pay for most of it, when it is passed on in the prices of the commodities he must buy to live.
Reagan was not the man that the myth suggests.
You mean you’re ready to use nuclear weapons to defend your glorious lord masters in Israel against any and all enemies, real or imagined?
I’m sure glad its not you with your finger on the red button.
You have tricked yourself through upside down Heigalian logic and sophistry into a complete slave mentality.
I can’t say much for your reading comprehension, Ike. I said the opposite of what you accuse me of saying. I suggested that we need to convince Israel’s antagonists that we will come to their aid with swift and significant conventional forces, to PREVENT Israel determining they need to use their nukes to defend themselves from total annihilation. The very last thing I could ever be fairly accused of is a ‘slave mentality.’
You are definitely right in several areas of your observations. However I am surprised that you claim to be a heathen and seem pretty proud of it. If you read the Holy Bible you would completely understand what is going on right now with our government and what is going on with Israel and the other countries. The truth be known we are in the middle of a stealth jihad. In 1974 the FBI discovered some papers that showed that the Muslim Brotherhood was keenly aware that the United States had an open policy and government and instead of violently attacking us they could take over the government by stealth jihad. Our current president was raised on Islamic ideals and was sponsored by the Saudis at his Law School. The Saudis even donated a large sum to the college. The honest truth of the matter is Obama is a manchurin candidate bought and paid for by the Saudis. The Bible warns of the nations turning against Israel. When Obama says he is a Christian he is lying. The Bible teaches that…
…Pray to Jesus Christ today to forgive you of your sins and trust that he purchased a place in heaven for you. Because seriously ALL HELL IS ABOUT TO BREAK OUT HERE ON EARTH. SHALOM
God I love religious zealots.
Better to love a religeous zealot than a political dictator/tyrant.
One of the many proofs of the validity of Scripture is the uncanny way it foretells the future. We are watching it play out in the daily news. The end times are coming – eventually. The speed is unknown. Maybe we will get a reprieve of 10 years; maybe it will escalate tomorrow.
No one can deny the direction the world is going and that it mirrors the Bible’s predictions. Everyone reading this: get on board while there is still time.
Brenda, you laid out an excellent case for repentence. To those unable to see the evil influences in this world as well as the supernatural miracles, it is foolishness. So sad. What will be their defense as they stand before the LORD in their final judgment? They can’t say they weren’t warned.
On another note, of all the blogs I’ve read recently none have made a case for convincing the non-progressive Democrats to give their fringe communist leaning comrads the boot. Why? Is the Democratic Party so deeply penetrated there is no hope of saving the party from the inside? Just curious.
Thank you all for your insights and for loving this country. On behalf of my children and grandchildren, I pray things get better before they get worse.
The LORD is merciful and mighty.
For the love of Zeus, Brenda, take a breath! I just plugged your post into a word processor and there were 2042 words in a single paragraph! What a righteous rant! You are to be commended for your passion. I actually compelled myself to read it in its entirety, out of respect for the fact that you had taken the time to read my essay, even though I encountered nothing of which I was unaware.
You see, as a young man I was studying to become an evangelical preacher; but I never recovered from the ‘Dark Night of the Soul’ so commonly experienced by religious scholars. In any case, I would be more than happy to have a religious debate with you; but this is not the place for it. I have deleted the vast majority of your post in order that others can find their way past it to the further commentary on the subject at hand.
I have saved your masterpiece, however, and perhaps at another time I will post it by itself to start a religious debate, if I perceive any interest. If I do, I will contact you to invite you to the discussion. Thanks for your participation. ◄Dave►
I pledge resistance to the czar, of the divided States of America, and to the communism for which he stands. One socialist, without God, divisible with healthcare and welfare for all.
Good one, Don.
Unfortunately, everything written, although far more articulate than the average tea party rantings, is false. There is simply no requirement that a NBC have two citizen parents. Vattel is not the law of this country. The constitution does not define the term Natural Born citizen. The case of Minor v. Happensott(I am not sure that I am spelling that correctly) equates NBC with native born and indicates that there are only two kinds of citizens, citizens at birth and naturalized citizens. It therefore defined NBC as a citizen at birth. The only question is who are citizens at birth? This was a question that was left open by the Supreme Court in Minor. The legislature defined citizens at birth in title 8, section 1401. Subsection a says that a child born on US soil is a citizen at birth. This is regardless of parentage. Obama, having been born in Hawaii on August 4, 1961 is, in fact, a NBC and eligible to president of the United States. In light of that, what else ya got?
I disagree, of course, and so do many legal scholars. Go read Article I, Section 8, Clause 10 of our Constitution and tell me what you think our Founders meant by “Law of Nations?” ◄Dave►
Dave, you would be wrong about that and I have yet to see an analysis by any serious legal scholar that is contrary to what I said AND there is no case, law or any other authority for your argument.
Dave, I challenge you to find one legal authority for your position. Any authority whatsoever. The fact is that not one case in this country has ever held what that a person needs two citizen parents in order to be a NBC. NOT one.
Article One Section 8, clause 10 has nothing to do with eligibility for the presidency. Please provide any authority for the proposition that two citizen parents is required to be a NBC or I suggest that you stop arguing it.
Sure, Steve… start here:
http://federalistblog.us/2008/11/natural-born_citizen_defined/
There are some very serious legal scholars at that site. Get back to me after you have fairly read it carefully… ◄Dave►
Dave wrote:
I have read your linked article in its entirity and find it rather disingenious.
Dave…please forward your bank account numbers so I can wipe out your retirement savings because I know you obviously do not care about what your hard work has earned…..or maybe you are just a shill and you do not want others to read the article. Please tell us all why the a article is “disingenious”?
Steve wrote:
Reagan was not the man that the myth suggests.
ITS NOT A MYTH. And apparently you too are either drinking the kool-aid, or your a shill.
The american people were robbed of 2.5 trillion dollars. And this is coming to light to thousands of americans who have believed in the government. This is not new to me, but it will be news for a lot of other folks who have placed their trust in the USA government.
Guess what? Its true. The government is filled with criminals, liars, frauds, and the like. And this is just the icing on the cake!!
I am not foolish enough to have my retirement savings in a bank account. Inflation alone is wiping cash savings out. My poke is all in precious metals. ◄Dave►
this is the clincher….
Reagan was trying to save SSI, not loot it. The same for Bush in ’04.
WOW….now that’s a failure in comprehension. Really?
Reagan was a tool…nothing more. An actor with a big ego. I suppose you valued Greenspan as well and you will claim he was good for America?
WOW….I admire you patriotism, but I fail to see what it is that you are proud of in this country.
If Reagan was a “tool” then the whole system is truly a sham game, which I don’t want to play anymore. That means it is high time for another revolution. I am not quite sure where you are coming from… Who would you like to see elected (who is not a tool), to “fix” our problems?
Dog, I was agreeing with you. Reagan was a racist, his economic policies set us on the current path to bankruptcy. He was fond of playing race war games, (welfare queen sound familiar?) and class warfare. In addition, he raised taxes a number of times, emptied the mental hospitals which resulted in a huge increase in the homeless, gave amnesty illegal aliens, traded arms with our enemies, and ran up the deficit. He was an amiable, tough sounding guy that the GOP created this myth about and which continues to sell the myth.
Obot
Racer, you have no idea what my politics are, but of course your mind could not accept that I want the law followed and could possibly not be an Obama supporter. You can call me an Obot all day long but it still won’t make it true. I could call you a tea bagger, but since I have no idea what your politics are, I won’t. I will just assume that you are uninformed and are making assumptions. If you want to know about my politics, ask me.
I am inclined to agree with Jim. You were doing pretty good at playing the independent, until you tripped up with the “racist” and “tea bagger” mantras. They are dead giveaways, Steve. Why is it you folks always equate antipathy for altruism with racism? Is it your own latent racism? If I decry your Robin Hood collectivist mentality, it has absolutely nothing to do with the race of your victims. Reagan was not a racist, he was a capitalist. You folks eroneously equate the two.
And again, you would be wrong Dave.
Dave, I am a capitalist through and through. Again, you make assumptions about my politics, which, again you know nothing about. You lose credibility when you deny the true about Reagan. I do not equate racism and capitalism. I equate exploiting the racial fears of white voters with racism. Why do you assume that one cannot be a capitalist and a racist?
Oh and Dave, I have nothing but disdain for the tea party movement for a multitude of reasons. But I reserve my special contempt for birthers. I consider them all to be traitors. And, you will never hear me say anything about Obama’s policies because I don’t care for his policies. But i do not believe that my displeasure over his presidency gives me the right to circumvent the law.
Racer, I just read your post under mine about assassination. You do realize, or at least I hope you do, that the hatred you express to Obama will be used to help him get re-elected and as such, is totally misguided, as is the entire birther movement. I oppose efforts that will help him get re-elected. So why are you working so hard to do that?
That is the best synopsis and logical article I have read … gets to the heart of the matter and offers a practical recourse in the hands of the people themselves. I have turned the article into a PDF (& added a little artwork) that should be easy for everyone to send by email to as many people as they can. The PDF is available on my site at:
http://www.modernfeudalserf.org/articles/support_and_defend.pdf
As a PDF it can also be easily printed and passed around that way too.
To the future!
The Serf
Nice job, Sir! Thanks, I thought of doing that myself; but never got around to it. I corrected your URL, and will be linking to it myself here and there. ◄Dave►
T.K.–you cannot seriously argue that Reagan did not play the racial card and play into white fear. That cannot be seriously disputed. Reagan was a horrible president, not just a bad one.
I dispute it. By now, “white fear” is pretty much a distant memory, except perhaps in the cities, which are populated mostly by Progressives, not Conservatives. Conservatives no longer fear Blacks, they are just tired of supporting their indolent layabout lifestyle mired in victimhood in the ghettos. Far more prevalent is “White Guilt,” as described by Shelby Steele. Which is the more agregeous exploitation of voter emotions? Those indoustrious Blacks, who wish to be respected for their individual achievements, are unfairly stigmatized by both.
I was talking about Reagan Dave.
And what do you think that the fight over entitlements is about? It sure as shit ain’t about money.
I understood you were accusing Reagan of racial politics, and I dispute it. The fight over entitlements is, at least from my perspective, a fight between altruism and capitalism, or between collectivism and individual libertarianism.
The altruists assert that the collective is more important than any individual, and has the right to decide by majority rule to force a minority of producers, to share their income with a majority of the less industrious.
The capitalists assert that as free soveriegn individuals, they are not serfs or slaves to a majority or the collective. They assert that what they earn through their industry may not be legally confiscated for redistribution to the indolent. It is always about money (and power), Steve. ◄Dave►
Dave, I asked for legal authority. A case, a statute, some kind of precedent. what you presented was interesting reading, but legally meaningless. Postings on a conservative blog mean nothing.
If you cannot admit that Reagan played racial politics then there is no point in discussing anything with you. It was such a basic tenant of his politics that he kicked off one of his campaigns in Philadelphia, Mississippi for God’s sake.
Well, that is precisely the sort of research and legal opinion that will go into the legal briefs, it the SCOTUS is ever enticed to actually consider the question.
OK, Steve… thanks for stopping by…
Only when there is no legal authority. There is legal authority for the proposition I gave. You have no argument, no facts, no law, just rhetoric that has not been accepted by any court in the United States. I strongly suggest that you read the Minor decision, all of your answers are there.
Dave: Thanks for sharing your site at drkatesview, Citizen WElls, ORYR, GiveUsLiberty1776, OneNationUnderFraud, the Post & Email, or wherever this came from! Great “Thoughts Aloud”!
How about these sites for “Legal Authority” for the professional paid Obot from We The People’s White House (illegally paid I might add):
http://puzo1.blogspot.com/
http://naturalborncitizen.wordpress.com/
Do tell, Saska? Thanks for the kind words. Have I finally attracted the attention of the WH? I feel so honored.
Do we know for a fact that brother Steve is one of the paid minions, or is that conjecture? I was saving Leo’s site for later; but these trolls get all discombobulated if one treats them nice and replies with logic and fact, instead of ad hominem. I guess he found it unpleasant here and difficult to gain traction on topic; so he had to go for the distraction of lashing out at Reagan.
I am unfamiliar with most of the sites you mentioned, where you may have found this; only Post & E-mail and I haven’t posted it there. Of course, since I gave permission, others have posted it in its entirety on their blogs, so I have no idea how far it has spread. I should look your suggestions up and post a link in some comment section. Thanks again… ◄Dave►
See Dave, I know the truth about birthers, the story no one is talking about. I know what you are really so afraid of when you have to admit that Obama is eligible. See I am not one of the people who think it is about the color of his skin. But yes, I do know the truth.
And one of the articles on your website confirmed my beliefs Dave. At least you are pretty open about it. It is not about the constitution is it? It is not even really about Obama’s presidency, is it? We have survived bad presidents before and will again. It is about something entirely different that you are terrified of, isn’t it Dave?
Steve, you are visiting my parlor. I just exercised my natural right, as the indisputable sovereign of this domain, to regulate the level of discourse here, by deleting one of your posts. If hereinafter you are unable to refrain from ad hominem and abusive language, you will be banished to the perhaps less civil environs you are accustomed to haunting.
Please enlighten us as to this fear you perceive among those of us who take the plain meaning of our Constitution seriously, and demand of our subservient employees that they keep the oath to support and defend it, which we required them to take when we offered them their jobs, by enforcing the eligibility clause for the office of POTUS. I prefer to refer to this as the ‘eligibility controversy,’ thereby acknowledging that there are two sides to the issue; but of course, your ilk chooses to label anyone even politely asking obvious questions about the personal history of the mystery employee in the WH, with the derogatory tag of ‘birther.’
No Dave, you deleted my post because I called you on your BS and you didn’t have a response for it. Like all good fascists, your answer to dissent is to delete and censor. I realize that this is not the government and that the first amendment does not apply here, but I am astounded by how many “constitutional conservatives” believe in censorship.
You don’t like being called birthers? Tough, I didn’t throw the first salvo. Your buddy called me an obot and it has been suggested that I am on the WH payroll which I find equally insulting. My language was not abusive, it was simply true. If you find the truth unpleasant or unpalatable, that is your problem and not mine. If you choose to ban me, you will only prove that I am right about your desire to censor dissent. I will neither retract nor apologize for my previous comment, which you in all your nazi like paranoia, chose to delete.
You can talk all you want about the “plain meaning” of the constitution, but that is not the law. But Dave, I do know what you are afraid of, make no mistake about that.
By what authority do you think that you have the right to demand (there is no polite asking) proof of eligibility to meet YOUR subjective standard after he has proven his eligibility to the satisfaction of every official body that has looked into the issue. While you are pondering that question, keep in mind that when Obama was elected and before he took office, there was a republican President. Name one statute, law, regulation, ordinance or case law that you are relying upon. Not posts from some right wing, neonazi blog, but real, actual authority, such as I provided to you (you can whine and bitch and moan all you want to, but the law is NOT what you say it is).
You posted an article about Mexicans. This is indicative of the motive behind the birther movement. I don’t believe that most of the truly hard core birthers are concerned about the color of Obama’s skin, although some are. The truth is that if I am right, and I am, then anchor babies are NBC, which they are. Those who tend to be birthers are also people who complain vociferously about illegal immigration. What you are really terrified about is what will happen if the child of an illegal alien gets into a position of power and what that would mean to our immigration policy. You don’t have to admit that I am right, I know I am.
You should have fun in here with no dissent slapping each other on the back so you can pretend that you are smart. That is easy when you don’t tolerate dissenting opinions.
Nobody is censoring your dissenting opinions, Steve, and I have even wasted my time bantering with you; but I am not required to put up with being called egotistical, dumb, stupid, jackass, and told that I have “utter contempt for the constitution” (which I cherish, and you won’t even capitalize) all in one short post.
Now, you are calling my opinions ‘BS’ and me a ‘fascist,’ with ‘nazi like paranoia.’ You refer to the Constitutional Law scholars at FB as a ‘neonazi blog.’ If you don’t reckon all this to be abusive language, Son, you could use a mite of schooling. In any case, I do; and I’ll waste no more time fussing with you. Good day. ◄Dave►
There is NO “President” Obama:
http://www.thepostemail.com/09/11/2010/there-is-no-president-obama
Well said, Robert! Thanks for stopping by, and thank you for the new word, ‘billabong.’ I had heard it of course, but had never bothered to look it up. Now, I have to find an excuse to use it.
I love words, so I try to make a practice of never reading past a one I don’t know, without looking it up. This must be my vocabulary enhancement week. I am about 1/3 through David Mamet’s marvelous new book, “The Secret Knowledge: On Dismantling American Culture.” Thankfully I am reading an e-book version of it on my Kindle App, with the built-in dictionary; because I have already encountered more new words in it than I normally find in a dozen scholarly books combined. The man is a walking thesaurus.
[...] Support and Defend [...]
Jane Randolph Jefferson, the mother of President Thomas Jefferson, was born in London. President Jefferson was a Founding Father whose father was an American citizen and whose mother was a British subject. You claim that the Founders’ definition of “Natural Born citizen” is a person who is born on American soil and whose parents are both American citizens. Then why would Thomas Jefferson be elected as the third President? There were Founders around during that election, and Jefferson was a Founder himself. They did not prevent his presidency. Clearly, that was not their definition of “Natural Born citizen.”
Oh good grief, Meredith… Go read Article II, Sect. 1, Clause 5 of the Constitution and stop demonstrating how dumbed down Amreicans have become. You will find that it specifically excepts those born before its adoption.
Then, if the United States didn’t even exist until Jefferson helped found it, pray tell how his father was already a citizen of a nonexistent nation? Have we deteriorated to the point where the Left is simply incapable of rational thought processes? ::mutter, mutter:: ◄Dave►
51 Bullet-Pointed Facts That Dispute Barack Obama’s Identity & Eligibility to be President of The USA! Share This
By Kevin A. Lehmann on in Politics
http://catchkevin.com/51-facts/
1. The Unenforced Definition of “Natural-Born Citizenship”
The U.S. Constitution requires that a presidential candidate be a natural-born citizen in order to be eligible for the office of President.
In seeking to define the meaning of “natural born citizenship”, those who blindly support Obama desperately seek a minimalist’s definition of the term. They desire that a natural-born citizen is one to whom may be ascribed as few requirements as possible in order that a candidate, with whom they share ideological fetishes, can be president regardless of his actual fitness for the office. They seek to assume jurisdiction over the declaration of being “natural born” in the minds of as many as possible while contending that “natural born citizenship” means the fewest, most remedial natal circumstances possible, which will allow their politigod, Barack Obama, just enough legitimacy to squeak by and be eligible.
Their definition allows Obama to merely meet what they consider the most easily argued, though obviously unverifiable characteristics of Obama’s obscure citizenry, in this case, his birth place.
…
[[[Note: The content of this post was a lengthy article that is available at the above link. The remainder was deleted here, as way beyond the "fair use" standard.]]]
Hi Saska,
Sorry, but I don’t allow full articles that I have not been given express permission to republish. I left enough to whet the reader’s appetite and the link where they can find the rest, which is all I would have done had I decided to share it with our readers.
That said, I did read it, and it was certainly impassioned. I would take issue with much of his conjecture regarding the motives behind our Founder’s inclusion of the NBC requirement in the POTUS eligibility clause. In particular, the marital status of a candidate’s parents would have been an issue between them and their church at the time. It certainly is not a matter of importance to a Federal government, whose very purpose was to defend the freedom of all citizens, to live their lives as they chose to live them. ◄Dave►
Hi Dave:
I find that lots of times, those that NEED to know (“Eligibility Deniers”) won’t click on the links. But I will respect your rules whenever I post here! Thanks for doing this blog, it’s a Good ‘n!
Oh, I understand your passion and frustration with the Obots. I just don’t need any hassles with anyone’s lawyers over copyright infringement. Thanks for your understanding and continued participation here. ◄Dave►
[...] Support and Defend [...]
Good job. Where can you verify this information anyone know??
What did he expect from a man who made his millions ripping off our money. Him and these pill mills are like birds of a feather.
[...] Read the whole thing. Share this:TwitterFacebookLike this:LikeBe the first to like this post. [...]